Disclaimer

This is to inform that by clicking on the hyperlink, you will be leaving sc.com/sg and entering a website operated by other parties.

Such links are only provided on our website for the convenience of the Client and Standard Chartered Bank does not control or endorse such websites, and is not responsible for their contents.

The use of such website is also subject to the terms of use and other terms and guidelines, if any, contained within each such website. In the event that any of the terms contained herein conflict with the terms of use or other terms and guidelines contained within any such website, then the terms of use and other terms and guidelines for such website shall prevail.

Thank you for visiting www.sc.com/sg


Proceed
  1. Home
  2. The weakening of US influence?
svg iconsvg icon
The weakening of US influence?
By Steve Brice, Global Chief Investment Officer, CIO Office
Wealth BuildingInvestment Strategies
24 March 2025  I  5 mins read

A more transactional US foreign policy is likely to lead to a reduction in the US’s global influence. The current over-representation of US financial assets in global indices may be in the process of peaking. Therefore, it is important not to neglect non-US assets in your portfolios.

One thing is clear: if you rely on the US for anything – demand for your exports or supply of critical hi-tech products such as advanced semiconductors, financial aid or military protection – you could be increasingly at risk of being strong-armed by the new US administration. This is creating havoc in the short run, but in the long run it will create a new world order with a dramatic reduction in the US’s influence across the globe.

The first thing I want to point out is that this is not a rant against the new US administration’s policies. Some of what is being proposed makes total sense. For instance, it is easy to argue that Europe should have been spending a lot more on its military capabilities when arguably it faces the biggest risk to its borders.

However, what is undeniable is that the US has huge leverage over much of the world given its economic, political and military power. The difference now is that the new US government is more willing to use this leverage to strike deals with various countries that are beneficial to the US and detrimental to their counterparties. In the short term, US allies and adversaries don’t really have much of a choice. Of course, they can and will push back in different ways to try to get better terms, but deals will be done. In the long run, the message is clear. Everybody needs to calibrate the extent to which they are comfortable being reliant on the US.

Implications of more transactional US foreign policy

On the trade front, this means relying less on the US consumer. Trump’s interpretation of the US’s soaring current account deficit is that non-US countries have been manipulating the trade rules to their benefit and the US’s detriment. An alternative view is US consumers’ willingness to consistently spend more than they earn, which was aided by the extraordinary fiscal boost since the pandemic, has been the cause of the deficit (more than 3% of GDP). These goods demanded by US consumers must be produced by somebody and the rest of the world is more than willing to step in to fill the void left by the US industrial economy, which remains at close to full capacity.

A more transactional US foreign policy also means identifying key vulnerabilities in supply chains, particularly any over-reliance on one country, especially the US. While the US wants to export more to other countries, any such over-reliance can also be used as leverage to extract concessions at a later stage.

Finally, for Europe, it also means spending more on the military, again ideally on equipment and technology produced locally or regionally, rather than in the US.

Implications for investors

What this mean for investors is that while deals are done in the short term, it probably implies that US exceptionalism continues.

However, over the long term, the whole economic and geopolitical order could gradually be re-engineered. This presents opportunities for economies around the world, such as Europe, China, Russia and the Middle East.

Given the extreme valuation differentials between the US and the rest of the world, this is potentially extremely important.

The narrative up until the beginning of this year was summed up in ‘TINA’, i.e., there is no alternative to US assets.

However, the sanctioning of the Russian central bank in 2022 challenged this to some extent as it sent shockwaves through the central bank community. Central banks of economies that are not fully aligned with the US’s world view have been scrambling to try to reduce its reliance on US assets (something that is really challenging, given that the depth and liquidity of the US government bond market is still unrivalled). Gold appears to have been the primary beneficiary of this shift in central bank demand so far.

The case for diversification

Meanwhile, for equities, the increasingly aggressive US policies could prove to be the catalyst for reshaping the growth drivers of companies, industries and countries over the coming years and decades in ways it is difficult for us to fathom today.

Add in the ‘you’re either with us or against us’ atmosphere and it is easy to see some US companies suddenly falling out of favour, sharply curtailing their prospects. Such uncertainties usually lead to lower valuations (price-earnings ratios).

Therefore, the current over-representation of US financial assets in global indices may be in the process of peaking. As with the adage with bankruptcy, this will likely happen very slowly and then all of a sudden.

For over a decade now, long-term expected returns have been higher for non-US equities and US equities have outperformed regardless. Maybe this is about to change. For us, the key barometer will be the US dollar. As with other US assets, the US dollar is overvalued. If it were to break decisively below the range it has traded since late 2022, and there are whiffs of this in the past week, this would likely herald a strong outperformance of non-US assets. Therefore, it is important not to neglect non-US assets in your portfolios.

(Steve Brice is Global Chief Investment Officer at Standard Chartered Bank’s Wealth Solutions unit)

Your feedback is valuable to us. Did you find this article helpful?

Disclaimer

This article is for general information only and it does not constitute an offer, recommendation or solicitation of an offer to enter into any transaction or adopt any hedging, trading or investment strategy, in relation to any securities or other financial instruments. This article has not been prepared for any particular person or class of persons and does not constitute and should not be construed as investment advice or an investment recommendation. It has been prepared without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any person or class of persons. You should seek advice from a licensed or an exempt financial adviser on the suitability of a product for you, taking into account these factors before making a commitment to purchase any product or invest in an investment. In the event that you choose not to seek advice from a licensed or an exempt financial adviser, you should carefully consider whether the product or service described herein is suitable for you.

You are fully responsible for your investment decision, including whether the investment is suitable for you. The products/services involved are not principal-protected and you may lose all or part of your original investment amount.

Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited will not accept any responsibility or liability of any kind, with respect to the accuracy or completeness of information in this article.

Deposit Insurance Scheme

Singapore dollar deposits of non-bank depositors are insured by the Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation, for up to S$100,000 in aggregate per depositor per Scheme member by law. For clarity, these investment products are not deposits and do not qualify as an insured deposit under the Singapore Deposit Insurance and Policy Owners’ Protection Schemes Act 2011. Foreign currency deposits, dual currency investments, structured deposits and other investment products are not insured.

The information stated in this article is accurate as at the date of publication